Conceptual Frameworks
Educational and Professional Conceptual Frameworks
The McMaster Occupational Therapy Program is based on conceptual frameworks grounded in the educational preparation of health professionals (the Educational Foundations) and professional foundations of occupational therapy practice (Professional Foundations). Together these conceptual frameworks are integrated throughout the curricula as illustrated by the model below:
Educational Philosophies
The Educational Foundations includes the philosophies, theories and approaches that are drawn upon to guide delivery of education in the Occupational Therapy Program (i.e., the Educational Foundations summarize ‘how we teach’). There are five distinct, yet highly inter-connected Educational Foundations. Each is described briefly here:
Self-Directed Learning (SDL), as outlined by Knowles (1975), clearly assigns the major responsibility for learning to the student. Within the framework provided by the goals and objectives of the program, students should be able to determine their own learning goals, how best to achieve their objectives, how to select learning resources, and how to measure their own progress. Faculty facilitate learning by asking questions, stimulating critical thinking, challenging the students’ point of view, providing feedback, and evaluating student performance. Students are encouraged to think and discover during the process of gaining new knowledge, and not simply memorize facts. Self-directed learning is a component of life-long learning, which is now a clear expectation for all occupational therapists as practitioners within a regulated health profession. Self-directed learning provides students with the essential skills needed to work within changing practice contexts.
Problem-Based Learning (PBL), as a conceptual framework, contends that knowledge is best remembered in the context in which it is learned, and that acquisition and integration of new knowledge requires activation of prior knowledge. In contrast to the common approach of using a problem for application after learning has taken place, problem-based learning requires that the learner encounter a problem first as the initial stimulus for learning. The learner thus becomes actively involved in the learning process, can shape it to meet personal needs based on prior knowledge and experience, can engage in independent study appropriate to his/her unique learning style, and can integrate information from many sources, including student peers, into a conceptual framework for use in dealing with future problems.
Small group learning is a natural extension of problem-based learning. To maximize small group learning, we believe it is important to bring students from various educational and work experience backgrounds together so that the heterogeneity of the group itself becomes a valuable learning resource. The transfer of knowledge is enhanced through the use of problems that encourage students to not only learn content, but also to develop strategies to recognize the ‘analogy’ or ‘principle’ that can then be transferred to new problems and contexts.
Inter-Professional Education is an emerging approach to professional preparation of health professional students. IPE is defined as “occasions when two or more professions learn with, from and about each other to improve collaboration and quality of care” (The Center for Advancement of Inter-professional Education (CAIPE), 1997). The occupational therapy program offers opportunities for students to achieve inter-professional competencies through the formal curriculum. Student occupational therapists are also encouraged to further their development of these competencies through offerings within the Faculty of Health Sciences. The Faculty of Health Sciences at McMaster University has developed PIPER (Program of Inter-professional Education and Research) to encourage students to develop strong collaborative and team skills for future practice. Our Occupational Therapy Program has firmly placed inter-professional education as a mandated activity for all students. The PIPER model provides students with four IPE competencies and three levels of activities from which they may choose to meet the mandatory requirements.
Experiential Learning is another important pillar of the McMaster Occupational Therapy Program. Students are engaged in numerous “hands on” learning experiences throughout their education. This includes classroom and community-based sessions that are part of university-based terms; in addition, clinical education offers rich experiential learning opportunities over 28 weeks of practical experience in four different settings. An important component of experiential learning is reflection; it is only through reflection on what was done, accomplished, observed or learned that a student can more readily generalize and build on the learning. Throughout university-based and practical courses, students are expected to engage in reflections which support them to consolidate and generalize their development as professionals.
The final pillar of the educational conceptual framework is Inquiry-Based Learning, which is a student-centred, active learning approach focusing on questioning, critical thinking and problem solving. Although it shares features with problem-based learning, the approach is most often used in the McMaster Occupational Therapy Program in large-group classes. Students are engaged in learning that may begin with lecture or presentation by faculty, but readily moves into group discussions, team-based learning, or student presentations to support competency development.
Methods of Evaluation
Student performance is evaluated on a regular basis throughout the MSc (OT) Program using a variety of evaluation tools that are consistent with professional and educational conceptual frameworks that guide the program.
The evaluation process can be formative or summative, and as such, it provides valuable feedback to students to enhance their learning. Evaluations are also used to assure faculty, students, clients, and society that graduates possess the required knowledge, skills, and professional behaviours to function as competent professionals. Evaluation presents a challenge for any curriculum. As no single evaluation method can assess all domains of learning or competence, and students have varying strengths and approaches to learn and demonstrate their learning, various methods are used to evaluate students’ progress and achievements. The choice of the evaluation tool is based on its educational value (e.g., formative or summative), its measurement properties (e.g., reliability, validity, generalizability), and its feasibility (e.g., time needed, resources required, costs).
Some of the student evaluation tools used in the OT Program are described below:
Expandable List
Tutorial performance of the group as a whole and of each of its members (including the tutor) is evaluated on a regular basis throughout each term. The final student mark is based on knowledge, use of learning resources, group participation and facilitation, clinical reasoning, critical appraisal skills, and evaluation skills (i.e., self-assessment, peer-assessment, and tutor evaluation).
Written exams provide opportunities to demonstrate their understanding of foundational knowledge and/or clinical reasoning and use various formats including multiple choice, short or long answer formats. They may also include timed exercises that involve documentation of clinical observations or interactions.
Essays are used to evaluate knowledge, critical appraisal skills, critical thinking, analysis, and synthesis skills. The essay demonstrates a student’s understanding of principles or relationships, and fosters independent thinking and learning. Furthermore, it is used to develop and evaluate writing skills. Essays are assessed on content, organization, style, and mechanics. A problem write-up which focuses on a particular case scenario/client problem is a variation of the traditional essay, as are clinical or consultative reports.
Direct observation techniques are used primarily to evaluate technical, behavioural and/or clinical skills. This type of practical examination might be used to evaluate interviewing skills, assessment techniques, and/or use of therapeutic interventions. Direct observation is frequently used in clinical practica as well.
Oral presentations are also used throughout the program. A health care professional must be articulate, able to defend an opinion or position, and able to present information and ideas in an organized and clear manner. To help the students develop these skills, individual and group presentations are used as evaluation components in most terms. Poster or podium presentations are used to present results of students’ evidence-based practice projects.
Practicum Evaluation: The Competency Based Fieldwork Evaluation for Occupational Therapists (CBFE-OT) (Bossers, et al., 2007) is used to evaluate student performance during all practica experiences and guides remedial work. The use of the CBFE-OT which incorporates both visual analogue scale (VAS) and student learning objectives, reinforces the student’s role as an active participant in the process of learning rather than a passive recipient. In the professional preparation setting, the CBFE-OT allows the student to meet the Program objectives and also to pursue individual objectives. CBFE-OT is a document drawn up by the student and negotiated and approved by the practice preceptor or faculty member. It specifies seven essential competencies, what the student will learn, how this will be accomplished, within what time frame, and what specific evaluation criteria will be used for each objective. The CBFE-OT reconciles the “imposed” requirements of the Program with the learner’s own personal goals and objectives. It enables the student to individualize his/her own way of achieving personal learning objectives, and to measure the progress towards achieving them. Objective measurement of the attainment of essential competencies through the integration of skills, knowledge and professional behaviours is also guided by the competencies from the Profile of Occupational Therapists in Canada.
Dual Degree Option
Dual Degree Option Doctoral and Professional Degrees
Master of Science (Occupational Therapy) and Doctor of Philosophy (Rehabilitation Science) OR Master of Science (Physiotherapy) and Doctor of Philosophy (Rehabilitation Science)
The McMaster Rehabilitation Science Dual Degree program allows students to obtain the established Master of Science in Occupational Therapy (OT) and Doctor of Philosophy in Rehabilitation Science (RS) OR the Master of Science in Physiotherapy (PT) and Doctor of Philosophy in Rehabilitation Science (RS) offered within the School of Rehabilitation Science (SRS) in five (5) years.
The Dual Degree option will provide students with advantages through integrated scholarship training and professional development and stream-lined time efficiency. Completing the two degrees, an OT or PT professional degree and PhD, concurrently rather than sequentially will develop clinician scientists who have an understanding of the issues facing the professions, the potential contributions they can make and research expertise to undertake these roles.
The program will provide research training for individuals who will pursue leadership roles in areas including integrated research initiatives, interdisciplinary and knowledge translation health research. The graduates from this program will be leaders in advancing the contribution of rehabilitation science towards examining health outcomes within a broader scope.
Please visit the Rehabilitation Science Dual Degree page for more information.
Student Evidence-Based Practical Projects
Student Evidence-Based Projects
Title | Type | Size |
---|---|---|
OT-Class-of-2019-EBP-Summary | 3952 KB | |
OT-Class-of-2018-EBP-Summary | 3849 KB | |
OT-Class-of-2017-EBP-Summary | 3422 KB | |
OT-Class-of-2016-EBP-Summary | 4293 KB | |
OT-Class-of-2015-EBP-Summary | 6200 KB |
Terms at a Glance
Year 1 – September to July | Placement | |
Term 1 |
Wellness, Health & Occupation
This term provides students with opportunities to gain specific skills in identifying health and wellness issues in relation to occupation. Students will be introduced to theories of occupation and the application of OT models and frameworks in practice. They will explore concepts of clinical reasoning, ethical reasoning and critical appraisal. This term will set the foundation for practice through understanding the health care system and the OT’s role within it. |
OTP I
4 weeks |
Term 2 |
Person, Environment & Occupation
Students continue to learn about interactions between person, environment and occupation. Students begin to explore and critically appraise assessments commonly used by OTs. Process frameworks receive attention, including the Occupational Performance Process Model (OPPM) and Canadian Practice Process Framework (CPPF). |
OTP II
8 weeks |
Term 3 |
Disability & Occupation
The term provides students with opportunities to gain specific skills in understanding disability as a social and health construct; to explore disability across the life span and the relevance to occupational therapy practice in the home, community and institutions. Students critically appraise evidence related to commonly used interventions. Students continue to increase their knowledge related to OT assessment, treatment planning, intervention, discharge planning, and follow-up at a basic level. |
|
Year 2 – September to August | Placement | |
Term |
Complexities of Practice I: Children, Youth and Adults
This term focuses on theory and practice through a developmental lens. Students will explore in greater depth, complex issues in children, youth and adults. Advanced clinical reasoning skills and evidence-based decision-making will be highlighted, as well as consideration of health systems issues. Coursework will include professional reasoning and skills and inquiry courses and once weekly problem-based tutorials. An evidence-based practice course will begin in Term 4 including large group sessions, seminar groups and the initial stages of the evidence-based practice projects. |
OTP III
8 weeks |
Term |
Complexities of Practice II: Older Adults & Transition to Practice
This term will continue the exploration of the developmental continuum by addressing the impact of aging on the identities and occupations of adults and older adults. As the last academic term, there will be emphasis on the integration and consolidation of the knowledge, skills and professional behaviour that students have acquired throughout the OT Program in preparation for transition to professional practice. Coursework will include professional reasoning and skills and inquiry courses and once weekly problem-based tutorials. The evidence-based practice course will include large group sessions, independent team work and a symposium. There will be enhanced opportunities for independent learning and inter-professional education throughout the term. |
OTP IV
8 weeks |
Problem-Based Tutorial
Problem-based tutorial (PBT) groups are the hub of student learning in the occupational therapy program. This program is built upon the values and philosophy of problem-based, learner-centered education.
Working together with colleagues in a small group provides many opportunities for students to gain new knowledge; critically reflect on complex ideas and concepts; explore their own values, beliefs and attitudes in the context of working with others; and, to use the forum as a training ground for functioning in team environments for their future careers.
PBT is designed to allow small groups and individuals to identify knowledge strengths and needs, and to examine issues within the context of problems typical of professional practice as an occupational therapist. Each group, with the assistance of their tutor, will find their own means of exploring any given problem.
Click on the button below titled “What is PBT” to watch a video about PBT and the student experience in small groups.